As part of my Masters Degree I studied the effectiveness of NewsELA on student reading comprehension over a four month period. The data I collected was from several classes of diverse students encompassing basically all populations of students at our school site (SPED, EL, reclassified, EL, AP, Mainstream). After 4 months and two sets of data, I recorded an average advance of 1.5 grade levels in student reading comprehension. Here are my takeaways and details of how I did it.
I determined several things during my study:
- Students were more engaged and finished articles more thoroughly when they were using a platform that was familiar to what they were already using for social media(feedback from student surveys)
- Digital learning platforms like NewsELA positively influence student achievement slightly, even without teacher intervention.
- The use of digital learning platforms(like NewsELA) coupled with strategic teacher support helped students overall to raise a reading comprehension level over 1.5 grade levels(according to lexile data collected from quizzes). This was based on teachers using and training students to utilize text-dependent questions, annotations, and close-reading strategies like SQ3R
- Student engagement increased when students were given choice in the content of what they were reading.
The first set of data is from a 2 month period of time. I call this the “PRE-INTERVENTION DATA”. I simply asked students to read the articles I assigned and then to answer the quiz questions that followed. *My only other instruction was to lower the Lexile rating for the next article they read if they got less than 50% on the previous quiz.
PRE-INTERVENTION DATA
- 140 out of 374 quizzes over 50% with a Lexile of 1000+
- Average of Grade Level 7.820855615
- Average Lexile level attempted was 1055.2673
Intervention
Based on the findings of the pre-data, some changes were made in the delivery of reading non-fiction articles. Several strategies were adapted in the intervention to help with literacy development of students. First, students were coached in the use of Text Dependent Questions. I did this in two ways based on the Depth of Knowledge sentence frames:
1. I added questions in the margin of articles to focus student reading.
2.I asked students to use the DOK sentence frames and the SQ3R close-reading method to ask their own questions about the articles. I then responded to those questions or had them use the questions for in class discussions and debates. I always wanted them to focus on depth of knowledge level 3 questions because those were the best for discussion and critical thinking.
Along with the use of text dependent questions I coached students in making color annotations in the text. I also asked them questions that required them to go back into paragraphs and use several colors in their invitations. For example, “In the previous 2 paragraphs highlight all words that describe the TONE in green”. In particular, the annotation technique of SQ3R was a strong way to focus student reading and reflection which asks students to:
“Survey: skim text for headings and charts Question: turn headings into questions Read: read to answer questions Recite: answer questions and make notes Review: reread for details and unanswered questions” (Frey & Fisher-SQ3R Reading Strategy)
The “AFTER INTERVENTION DATA” results below are much more promising.
The end results suggest that digital learning platforms do enhance student reading comprehension of up to one full grade level across all populations of students when coupled with proper teacher support using methods of annotation and close-reading.
AFTER INTERVENTION DATA
|
Conclusions
The above statistics indicated that the intervention was successful. Overall, the teaching of literacy was positively enhanced by digital learning platforms. Even greater success was shown through the digital learning platforms coupled with teacher accountability of annotation techniques, text-based questions, and feedback strategies coached during the intervention process.
One teacher I surveyed this year embodied optimism about the CHS literacy Modules:
“I believe my students are becoming better writers because of this resource. I force them to write annotations and detailed summaries of the information using academic language. They also see the value in trying to push into higher Lexile levels. They like reading the articles and even after only using it a few times, I see a huge improvement.”
-CHS Teacher, 2016
The work we are doing with the Modules this year are aimed at supporting just this type of growth with student literacy in your own classes. If you’re interested in looking at your own data on NewsELA, get in contact with me and I can walk you through it. Otherwise, I’m available to help in any way I can with these intervention strategies in your own classroom.
Your Colleague,
Zane Boehlke







Most students felt it was easy to get started using HSTRY.co
A vast majority of students felt that creating a Timeline positively impacted their education. Creative format, collaboration, easy organization, and integration of media were all seen as positives for learning.
